Oh,
how the mighty have fallen. For a phone that single-handedly
resuscitated the business prospects of its parent company, gave a
much-needed boost to Google's fledgling Android and finally added a
compelling product to Verizon's lineup, the Droid can't get no respect. Initially billed as the anti-iPhone, the OG flagship
embodied an aggressively tech for tech's sake design ethos, with its
masculine, hard-edged build, geeky OS and Lucasfilm licensed moniker.
That
was all once upon a time. Now, two years later and sucked of its
disruptive significance, the only legacy remaining for the red-eyed
Droid franchise is its brand equity and QWERTY slider appeal. Aside from
BlackBerry addicts, most consumers appear none too chuffed to see those
slide-out keypads become the stuff of mobile lore, and instead prefer
those increasingly ubiquitous slabs (namely, of the 4.3-inch-and-up
persuasion). So, where did it all go wrong? Why is the Droid 4, now
imbued with LTE, getting the B-list treatment? Does a $200 price tag and
a host of minor spec bumps (a 1.2GHz dual-core CPU, 1.3 megapixel
front-facer and beefier 1,785mAh battery) merit another spin around the
two-year contract pole? Head on past the break to see whether this
former trailblazer can still do what it's namesake robot supposedly
does.
Hardware
Remember the lip? Long live the lip because it's sadly been erased. That signature design quirk, which stuck out as evidence of the keypad tucked below, has been replaced by an uninterrupted face, and those odd corners Moto ushered in with the Droid RAZR. Love it or hate it, that fresh (albeit jarring) build is sweeping the manufacturer's device portfolio, so it's best you make peace with it now. And so, with the launch of the Droid 4, it's clear the company's making a clean break from the traditions of the past. This device lacks any of the cutting-edge specs and "thin is in" appeal used to lure consumers in droves. Seemingly constructed with the enterprise user in mind, the phone manages to be both shockingly large and surprisingly comfortable to hold. Need a bit of convincing? At 127 x 67.3 x 12.7mm (5.0 x 2.65 x 0.5 inches), the unit's about 1 - 2mm thicker than its predecessor, in addition to being taller and wider. It's also managed to pack on some additional heft, weighing nearly 0.5 ounces heavier as compared to the Droid 3.
So,
about that full body lift. Gone are the rubberized backing and polished
metal frame that made the Droid 3 so familiar to users. In their place,
a texturized, all-plastic encasement. Moto's PR team claims the "Droid 4
is pretty," but we beg to differ. While we won't outright denounce its
construction as appalling, it is easily dismissed; a case of form
fitting function. It's not necessarily a minus, as this device feels
reassuringly solid and weighty in hand, mitigating any concerns that it
might accidentally slip from your grasp. Also conspicuously absent in
this refresh is that hitherto mandatory "with Google" branding, though
unfortunately Verizon's logos (4G LTE, as well) are still present. We're
not exactly the betting type, but we'd wager that omission of Mountain
View inside has a little something to do with a certain pending merger.
As for what lies beneath, well, we regret to inform you that access to
those internals requires a "key." Yes, rather than simply allow users to
slide off the phone's backplate, a special (and easily lost) plastic
piece is needed that, when combined with physical force, reveals a
non-removable 1,785mAh battery, microSIM and an empty microSD slot. We
should point out that with considerable manual effort, you will have
success in prying it free sans included tool.
Considering
this dual-core handset's being quietly targeted at the business set,
the phone cuts a rather staid figure, with its grooved posterior broken
up only by an 8-megapixel / 1080p camera up top, and a sliver of a
speaker on the lower left. Moving around to the front face, the 1.3
megapixel camera is positioned to the right of the smallish ear piece,
itself sitting just above Motorola's logo. Fans of unblemished frames
won't find a neat collection of ports and buttons here. On the Droid 4,
it seems, if there's empty space, it must be occupied. And so, each side
plays host to a specific function, with the mic below the screen,
micro-USB and HDMI sockets on the left and a volume rocker on the upper
right, in addition to the 3.5mm headphone jack and flimsy power button
on its head. There's no dedicated camera key to be found, but that's
probably for the best, given the power button's tendency to get stuck in
its slot.
Usually
when companies lock certain specs in place, it's a testament to not
fixing what isn't broken. On the other hand, when that hardware detail
happens to be a 4-inch, 960 x 540 PenTile LCD display, we're tempted to
call it laziness. If you're possessed of a keen eye and meticulous
attention to detail, then the poor contrast and low pixel density
offered by the Droid 4's screen should prove to be a major turn-off. Out
in broad daylight, even with brightness set to the maximum, we found
ourselves continually shielding the phone so as to render its contents
readable. This became particularly bothersome where photo-taking is
concerned, as we were never quite able to tell what was being framed by
the camera's viewfinder. Tilt slightly away from the phone and
immediately you'll notice an apparent wash out, although viewing angles
didn't take as drastic a hit.
Keyboard
Of
course, the shining and defining star of the Droid 4 is its QWERTY
slider. It's here that we truly see an investment in improved user
experience on Motorola's end. The slide-out pad is, quite simply, one of
the best available on the market. Fans of the OG Droid's terribly flat
and difficult-to-master setup have been treated to marginally better
layouts with each successive iteration. But this newest entry takes the
formula employed by last year's model and makes it much more intuitive.
The same raised, slightly curved, well-spaced plastic buttons permeate
the keyboard across five rows, with the uppermost reserved solely for
numbers. While directional keys are present, shortcuts for Android
navigation are absent. But we're guessing most users will naturally
reach above to manipulate the capacitive buttons, anyway. A soft
backlight, triggered by an ambient sensor, surrounds the base of each
individual key, which should make texting or emailing in the dark a
non-issue for power users.
Functioning much the way it always has, the slider mechanism is, as before, stiff and missing that comforting
snap
to lock. That said, it does give off the impression of durability, so
we'll err on the side of Moto's design choice here. Once opened, the
phone instantly resorts to landscape mode and a mere button press
triggers Google's search app, listing whatever contacts or apps that
match your entered text. Swype does come pre-installed, so if you happen
to tire of physical buttons, you can always opt for that alternative
touch option. Given the intrinsic QWERTY nature of the Droid line,
however, we don't anticipate you'll make much use of that software.
Software
To
call it MotoBlur would be a slap in the face to this less offensive
Android UX. Though it's far from the stock Ice Cream Sandwich pastures
we're confident the company will adopt post-Google merger (and hopefully
port to this handset), it's still a software overlay, however benign.
Moto's own PR team makes nary a mention of what was previously referred
to as its Application Platform -- a fancier term for skin -- which does
its best here to be as inobtrusive as possible, delivering a consistent
experience that should be recognizable to fans of the company's latest
phones. As you may have guessed, this 2012 device runs Gingerbread
(version 2.3.6, to be exact), so if you're holding your breath for that
planned ICS update, prepare to turn blue by summer's start.
You're
still given access to the same five homescreens, but, sadly, there's no
ability to reduce or add to that real estate as needed, although you
can customize the dock. Even the app drawer's remained unchanged,
displaying the entirety of the phone's app collection or sorting it by
user preference. As you might expect, the Droid 4 ships with
pre-installed bloat a plenty -- Verizon's contributions alone amount to
13 -- with the spread of third-party software ranging from the useful
(Twitter, Netflix, Amazon Kindle) to unnecessary (Let's Golf 2, Slacker,
Slingbox). Not one to be left out, Motorola's also crammed its own
dedicated applications onto the device's 8GB of storage, the most
helpful of which is Smart Actions, an intelligent system that learns
users' habits and adjusts settings to optimize battery life. Enterprise
customers will be happy to note that the Droid 4 comes loaded with
Citrix Receiver for Android, a feature accessible only in webtop mode
via an optional 10- or 14-inch lapdock.
Performance and battery life
Aided
by its dual-core 1.2GHz processor and generous 1GB of RAM, the Droid 4
zips along without faltering. While transitions between screens, as well
as in and out of apps can take a tick too long to complete for our
liking, we're sure that has more to do with the UX's own animations than
any real performance hiccup. Indeed, the 4-inch screen is incredibly
responsive, evincing a careful balance of touch recognition that's
neither overly sensitive nor stubborn. Call us creatures of habit, but
we noticed our own tendency to unconsciously rely on the phone's superb
touch controls, rather than its fine-tuned keypad. Could that be a sign
of these mobile times? Well, yes and no. Not all smartphone screens are
made equal and the Droid 4 just happens to benefit from this particular
performance tweak.
When
it comes to benchmark testing, our dear Droid 4 wasn't able to overtake
its flashier RAZR-thin cousin, but did eke out a few victories
nonetheless. Leaving the higher-clocked Galaxy S II's
near-pervasive dominance out of this, Moto's bulky slider scored a tie,
toppling its svelte stablemate in Linpack single-thread with a score of
52 and NenaMark 1 and 2 topping out at 53.3 fps and 27.9 fps. Results
for Quadrant and SunSpider make it appear as if the Droid 4 is
marginally less able, but the RAZR wins by an awfully miniscule margin.
| Droid 4 | Droid RAZR | Galaxy S II (unlocked) |
Quadrant | 2,755 | 2,798 | 3,200 |
Linpack (single-thread) | 52 | 50 | 55 |
Linpack (multi-thread) | 81.8 | 95.6 | 81 |
Nenamark1 | 53.3 | 50.3 | 59.8 |
Nenamark2 | 27.9 | 27.5 | 49.1 |
Neocore | 58.2 | 59.9 | 59.8 |
SunSpider 9.1 | 2,158 | 2,140 | 3,369 |
As much as we would've liked to see the Droid RAZR Maxx's
profile-fattening 3,300mAh battery built-in to the Droid 4, we're
perfectly at ease with the 1,785mAh provided. Notorious though LTE may
be for chipping away at charges, the allotted amount of non-removable
juice should serve to get you through a day, at most, with moderate to
light usage. Call upon the powers of Big Red's 4G network too
consistently and you're sure to see that longevity take a severe dip.
For a more concrete indication of this phone's battery performance, we
played a single video in a continuous loop with brightness set to 50
percent, Twitter syncing at 15 minute intervals and one push email
account active. Much to our delight, the Droid 4 lasted seven hours and
15 minutes, a considerable leap over the Droid RAZR's unworkable
five-hour threshold.
Verizon's
LTE network is no longer the sparsely-visited spectrum it was back in
the days of the Thunderbolt and, as such, is subject to heavier traffic
demands in New York City. So, it's understandable that previously
accessible speeds hovering around the high 20s and 30s aren't as
prevalent. Still, Big Red's 4G is reasonably fast, reaching max speeds
of 21Mbps up and 12Mbps and averaging 12Mbps to 19Mbps down and 8Mbps to
9Mbps down in our time testing the handset.
Camera
Of
the Droid 4's dual cameras, only its front-facer has received a spec
bump from VGA to a 720p-capable 1.3 megapixels. Where its rear shooter
is concerned, that module retains its 8-megapixel ancestry, offering up a
bevy of scene modes (portrait, landscape, etc.) and shooting options
(panorama, multi and timer), in addition to effects filters. The camera
performs admirably well when faced with optimal lighting conditions
(read: bright sunlight), snapping photos with exceptional detail, depth
of field and contrast. Attempt to take similar shots under fluorescent
lights indoors or even in dim environments and a noticeable loss of
quality will be evident in still shots. Users can hone in on an intended
object simply by tapping on screen, however, we noticed the sensor
would occasionally continue to readjust without cease. This became
increasingly problematic when attempting to take macro shots, with the
focus consistently skewing to the noise in the background.
No comments:
Post a Comment